Legal Opinion
State v. Hough
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2021No. 19AP-682PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Hough,
2021-Ohio-2198.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-682 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-6061) Richard M. Hough : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on June 29, 2021 On brief: [G. Gary Tyack], Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl L. Prichard, for appellee. Argued: Sheryl L. Prichard. On brief: Todd W. Barstow, for appellant. Argued: Todd W. Barstow. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas DORRIAN, P.J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Richard M. Hough, appeals the September…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HoughOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. HoughOhio Court of Appeals · 2021