Legal Opinion

Looney v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

Motion to dismiss a second amended complaint on the grounds (1) that it is legally insufficient (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 5) and (2) that there is another action pending (Buies Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 4).

The gravamen of the complaint is that the defendant lessors of a one-family house fraudulently concealed a condition in the leased premises whereby a precipitation of rain in excess of one inch in twenty-four hours would result in flooding the basement with water and sewerage to a depth of from one to four feet. Bescission of the lease, a return of the security, and damages in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Franklin v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Cornell v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pearson v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API