Legal Opinion
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. High Impact Design & Entertainment
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 10, 2009No. 2:07-cv-01033PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SANDOVAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant High Impact Design and Entertainment, S.A.’s (“HIDE Venezuela”) Motion to Set Aside Default (# 19) filed June 23, 2008. Plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (“ATI”) and Aristocrat Technologies Australia (“ATA”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default (# 20) on July 11, 2008. HIDE Venezuela filed its Reply to Opposition to Motion to Set Aside Default and Dismiss (# 21) on July 24, 2008.
After the Motion to Set Aside Default was fully briefed, Plaintiffs filed an Amended…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- AMA Multimedia, LLC v. MadonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Ashcroft v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Barbara Greist, et al. v. LendUS, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Elliott v. Dermatology and Skin Cancer of Las VegasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Escobar Inc. v. ReitbergDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.