Legal Opinion

Garson v. Rapping

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*931OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (105 AD2d 726). We add only that the cpurt properly applied the limited exception to the rule of strict compliance with the requirements of the Business Corporation Law (see, e.g., Matter of Rye Psychiatric Hosp. Center, 66 NY2d 333) recognized in Zion v Kurtz (50 NY2d 92, 102, rearg denied 50 NY2d 1060).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zion v. KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. SchoenholtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grimaldi v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Hughes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Darnet Realty Associates, LLC v. 136 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Mariner's Landing, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1989
  5. Ench v. BreslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API