Legal Opinion

Hoose v. Doody

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2008No. 43A03-0708-CV-420Published

1Opinion of the Court

886 N.E.2d 83 (2008)

Michael A. HOOSE and Darlene S. Hoose, Appellants-Plaintiffs,

v.

William H. DOODY and Judith A. Doody, Appellees-Defendants.

No. 43A03-0708-CV-420.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

May 16, 2008.

Stephen R. Snyder, Randall L. Morgan, Snyder, Birch & Morgan LLP, Syracuse, IN, Attorneys for Appellants.

Richard K. Helm, Rockhill Pinnick LLP, Warsaw, IN, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Michael A. Hoose and Darlene S. Hoose appeal the judgment on their complaint against William H. Doody and Judith A. Doody, denying the Hooses' request for a declaration of ownership…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Harrison v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Ohio Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McGill v. LingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API