Legal Opinion
Storm v. Pennsylvania Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtE. Howard Ringrose, J.
John Storm, doing business as storm feed company, the plaintiff herein, moves pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment against the defendant, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company (hereafter referred to as “ Pennsylvania ”).
The action was commenced by Storm against Pennsylvania as the original or initial carrier, to recover the sum of $1,056.55, with interest and costs, being the value of a shipment of bulk hominy, shipped on or about February 17, 1940 from Paris, Illinois, under a uniform order bill of lading to Schatzel Feed Store, at Leonardsville, New York. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wheeler v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Barnet v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Scire v. American Export Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Grieve v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joseph Resnick Co. v. KaishaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972