Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Estate of Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1993No. 9212SC364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, we find that the trial court did err and accordingly reverse the order.

Summary judgment is the device whereby judgment is rendered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 56(c). “Thus a defending party is entitled to summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Holley v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Wallace v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Federal Paper Board Co. v. Kamyr, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Word v. Jones Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Giles v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Word v. Jones ex rel. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Cooke v. GriggCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API