Pontius v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Error: Court of Appeals for Mahoning county.
1Opinion of the CourtPollock, J.
This is an action in error to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas of Mahoning county, in an action wherein the defendant in error was plaintiff and the plaintiff in *241error was defendant. The Struthers Savings & Banking Company is a corporation organized under the banking laws of this state, and for a number of years prior to the third of April, 1920, was doing a general banking business at Struthers, Mahoning county.
Some time prior to the 23d day of December, 1919, James A. Stewart, of Poland, Mahoning county, entered into an agreement with Sears, Roebuck & Company, of Chicago,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Marine Bank v. Fulton BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Casper v. JoyceWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Branciforti v. Ninety-Eighth, Realty Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1934