Legal Opinion

People v. Fenton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1993No. C014426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Defendant smuggled drugs into a jail by placing them between his toes. One drug was a controlled substance for which he held a physician’s prescription. The other drug was not a controlled substance. Convicted by jury of violating Penal Code sections 4573 (smuggling a controlled substance into a jail) and 4573.5 (smuggling a drug other than a controlled substance into a jail) and granted probation, defendant appeals. We conclude Penal Code section 4573 does not proscribe smuggling a controlled substance into a jail as long as the smuggler/inmate has a physician’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Perry, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. Raybon, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API