Legal Opinion

Ball v. Bayard Pump & Tank Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

We are called upon here to determine whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a separate trial of the claims of four test-case, or “bellwether” plaintiffs, from among the 45 plaintiffs in this case. For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the Superior Court erred.

This case stems from the underground leaking of gasoline from a gasoline station in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, which caused an explosion in the springhouse of a realty office situated across the street from the station. The leak was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Skipworth v. Lead Industries Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Polett, M., Aplt. v. Public Communications Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Cardinale, L. v. R.E. Gas, Appeal of: Hugney, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Comrie v. Atlantic States Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2014
  4. D. Solomon v. J.D. Hulme, IV v. Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. ~ Appeal of: J.D. Hulme, IVCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Dugan, J. v. Gallo, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API