Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Shoreridge Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1938No. Civ. 1668PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

By their amended complaint filed in this action in the Superior Court of Orange County on August 7, 1935, plaintiffs sought to subject real property owned by the defendant Lucy B. Freeman, to mechanics’ liens for materials furnished by them to the defendant’s lessee, Shoreridge Oil Company, to foreclose such liens, and to obtain a decree that the land be sold for the purpose of satisfying the liens. In her answer filed to said amended complaint Lucy B. Freeman alleged that prior to the institution of this action plaintiffs -had assigned the claims and demands which they asserted to one D.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Tuller v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cortelyou v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ingle Manufacturing Co. v. ScalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. GunnissMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Compton v. AtwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. George F. Kennedy, Inc. v. Miles & Sons Construction DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. McKoin v. RosefeltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Sunlight Electric Supply Co. v. Pacific Homes Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API