Sturgis v. Work
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Allen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.
Eobert Work, late of Allen county, died testate on the 3d day of July, 1886. By his last will and testament, to which, after it was first executed, there were *135added two codicils, he disposed of all his real iind personal .estate. Oné of the subjects of controversy arises out of the eighth clause of the will, by the terms of which the testator devised to his two daughters, Mary E. and Eliza J. Shoaff, an eighty-acre tract of land in De Kalb county, which is described as the “ west half of the southwest quarter” of a certain section, township and range.
The testator never owned the tract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Bruce v. BissellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Freeman v. . CoitNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Cleveland v. SpilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pate v. BushongIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Hagood v. HagoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Bedford v. Bedford's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Hayes v. MartzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Perkins v. O'DonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.