Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1973No. 72 Civ. 2742PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
The instant case is before this Court on the motion of defendant (hereinafter “Humble”) for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set out infra, the motion is granted in part and continued in part.
The case sub judice is the fourth in a series of arbitration, district court and appellate court proceedings growing out of a labor dispute between Humble and plaintiff (hereinafter the “Union”). Since the facts of that dispute are described in detail in a previous decision, Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Local 866, IBT, 321 F.Supp. 374…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Saylor v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. KirtleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Local Union 866District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- A. H. Fox v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Renaissance Lines, Inc. v. Saxis Steamship Co., and Multifacs International Traders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Dennis Rooney v. United States v. Reliance Insurance Company, Plaintiff-In-Intervention-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Driscoll v. Exxon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- MTS, Inc. v. 200 East 87th Street AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.