Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Exxon Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1973No. 72 Civ. 2742 (CHT)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
The instant case originated from a labor dispute in 1965 between defendant Exxon Corporation (hereinafter “Exxon”) (formerly Humble Oil & Refining Company) and plaintiff (hereinafter “Union”) concerning whether employees laid off by Exxon were required to repay money received as severance allowances as a condition of being recalled to work seven days later. After a series of arbitration, district court and appellate court proceedings, it was determined that Exxon had acted in violation of a collective bargaining agreement between itself and the Union when it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Boston Elevated Ry. CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Parr v. Scofield, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Driscoll v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Parr v. ScofieldDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- In Re Samoset AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1981
- Meehan v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
- Gelof v. PapineauDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- Emerick v. Teaneck Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.