Saliem v. Glovsky
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
Action on the case for abuse of legal process. Defendants move to set aside the plaintiff’s verdict for $250.00 because they assert it is against law and evidence and damages recovered are excessive.
Chronologically stated, the credible facts are (no evidence in defense was offered) that on September 2, 1932, the plaintiff, then indebted to the Bell Tire Company in the sum of $33.65 for tires and tubes, operated a small grocery store in the town of Bumford. Late afternoon of this day, these defendants, in behalf of said , *404Company, went to the office of a reputable attorney in Rumford and there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Malone v. BelcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Spear v. PendillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Simon, II v. NavonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.