Legal Opinion
Foreman v. Weinstein
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 27, 2007No. Civil PJM 05-3342PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Tramilla Foreman has filed a pro se Complaint against her former employer, Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-el7 (2004) (“Title VII”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2004). She alleges failure to promote based on gender and age. 1 The matter is before the Court on Weinstein’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. 2 Since Weinstein has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. VilsackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Daniel Edwards v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Draughn v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Foreman v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Herkert v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.