Legal Opinion

Kanenbley v. Volkenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Submission of .a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Oode of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The plaintiffs by this submission seek to procure a judgment compelling the specific performance by the defendants of a contract of sale entered into between the plaintiffs and defendants -of certain premises on East Seventeenth street in the city of New York. At the time and place agreed upon in said contract the plaintiffs tendered a . deed of the said premises which the defendants refused to. .accept, claiming that the same did not convey a marketable title. The specific defect is claimed to exist in a certain deed by and through which one Eichard Ó’Gorman became vested with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. G.L. P.J.R.R. Co. v. . N.Y. G.L.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. King v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Towar v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Pfeiffer v. RheinfrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Clapp v. ByrnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Straw v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. FallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Crawford v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Werner v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API