Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Van Pelt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 12, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action originally brought by William B. Sanford (now deceased) to divest defendants of the legal title to a certain described tract of land in the city of Springfield, Missouri, and to vest the same in plaintiff, said William B. Sanford. The original plaintiff having died after the cause had been appealed to this court, upon suggestion of his death in this court, by stipulation of parties the cause was revived in the name of Grady Sanford and F.M. McDavid, executors of the estate of William B. Sanford, deceased. The defendant E.F. Van Pelt is the record holder of the legal title to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Duncan v. JaudonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Parker v. BlakeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Milgram v. Jiffy Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Strohfeld v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Cunningham v. KinnerkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Little v. MetteeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API