Bluebonnet Express, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentRobertson, Justice
The extended discussion in the majority opinion of the requirement for filing a motion for new trial has nothing to do with this appeal. The issue before us is simply whether appellant has preserved for appellate review his sufficiency of the evidence contention. In the final analysis, the majority opinion holds that an objection made during trial to the admissibility of evidence is a sufficient predicate for appellate review of the legal sufficiency of the evidence to render judgment. I disagree and, therefore, respectfully dissent.
There is no question that the record in this appeal is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Pirtle v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Austin v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Kissman v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.