Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from Miller county. Hon. J. K. Young, Circuit Judge. Defendant should be prosecuted under the laws of Arkansas, sec. 1659, Gantt’s Digest, he having brought the stolen property into this State.

1Opinion of the CourtEakin, J.

After a jury had been impanneled to try the appellee on the charge of larceny, and had hoard the evidence, we are advised by the record that the court stopped the trial, and remanded the prisoner to jail, for a specified time, to await a requisition from the Governor of Texas. The record recites, that it appeared to the satisfaction of the court that the offense was committed in Texas, although the money alleged to have been stolen was found in defendant’s possession, in Miller county, Arkansas. The court was, therefore, of the opinion that it had no jurisdiction to try the cause.

By the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Peaper v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. State v. Alexander & MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. O'Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API