Legal Opinion

Alfred Leone v. David Putnam

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1972No. 72-1295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the holding of the district court that it could not grant specific performance of a contract for the sale of corporate stock which was held by husband and wife in an estate by the entireties, when only the husband signed the contract to sell.

Under Florida law, when stock is held in the joint names of both spouses, even if purchased with the husband’s own funds, an estate by the entireties is created unless there is an expressed intention to the contrary. Lapp v. United States, 316 F.Supp. 386 (S.D.Fla.1970); Porterfield v. Porterfield, 181 So.2d 16 (Fla.App.1965). See Matthews v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Matthews v. McCainSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Lapp v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1970
  4. Naurison v. NaurisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Porterfield v. PorterfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re AnselmiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of SilvianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API