Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Hudspeth

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 19, 1941No. 525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

The action is one in habeas corpus, one much out -of the ordinary. To the writer of this opinion, it appears that the petitioner Cassius McDonald might be likened to one near a whirlpool who was engulfed by swirling waters. He was indicted with the Bremer kidnappers. He was tried with two other defendants who had participated in the enterprise from its very formation, but guilt of the petitioner was claimed by the Government only on the ground that he entered into the conspiracy months after the kidnapping and for the purpose of exchanging some of the ransom money. In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AvilezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. George Krull and Michael Krull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Coates v. LawrenceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
  4. George Krull and Michael Krull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API