Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. City of Elizabeth City

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

On its appeal to this Court the plaintiff assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury, as requested by it, in writing and in apt time, that “if you believe all the evidence, and find the facts to be as the evidence tends to show, you will answer the issue ‘No.’ ”

This assignment of error cannot be sustained.

There was evidence at the trial tending to show that on 28 February, 1934, the plaintiff, the Texas Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal office in the city of Wilmington in said state, purchased from M. L.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Mitchell, County Attorney (Three Cases)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. County of Mecklenburg v. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of Plushbottom & Peabody, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. In re Appeal of Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Davenport v. Ralph N. Peters & Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API