Legal Opinion
State v. Condon
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1914No. 11547PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Okanogan county, Pendergast, J., entered September 5, 1913, dismissing a prosecution for larceny, upon sustaining a demurrer to the information.
1Opinion of the CourtCitow, C. J.
On September 5, 1913, the prosecuting attorney of Okanogan county filed an information in the superior court in and for that county, the charging portion of which reads as follows:
“That the said Dan Condon, on or about the first day of May, 1913, in Okanogan county, state of Washington, and within that portion of said county commonly known as the Diminished Colville Indian Reservation, then and there being, with the intent to deprive and defraud the owner thereof, *98did then and there feloniously steal from the range, lead, brand, drive away, and appropriate to his own use, one certain foal, to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. Big SheepMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Petition of CarmenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- In RE WESLEY v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Yohyowan v. LuceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.