Yohyowan v. Luce
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Upon the foregoing facts petitioner rests his application for discharge, on the contention that by virtue of section 328 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10502) jurisdiction of the crime of which he was convicted in the state court is vested exclusively in the courts of the United States, and in consequence the judgment of the superior court of Yakima *427county is pull and void. Section 328 of the Penal Code reads as follows :
“All Indians committing against the person or property of another Indian or other person any of the following crimes, namely—murder,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. CelestineSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. PelicanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tooisgah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- State v. Big SheepMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Petition of CarmenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- State ex rel. Irvine v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.