Legal Opinion

United States v. Connie Farris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2017No. 15-10297Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Connie Farris appeals pro se from the district court’s amended judgment, entered following remand, lowering the restitution award to $1,930,843.12. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Farris contends that the district court erred in considering a number of spreadsheets on which the government relied in its motion for restitution and incorrectly determined the amount of restitution. We review for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Alvarado-Martinez, 556 F.3d 732, 735 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court’s evaluation of the reliability of evidence used at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. John Doe, United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Brijido Mejia-PimentalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API