Legal Opinion

United States v. Houston

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2011No. 07-50478, 08-50165PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Henry Michael Houston and Wayne Bridgewater were jointly tried and convicted of a substantive Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violation, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); RICO conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and two counts of violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity (VICAR), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, arising out of their membership in the Aryan Brotherhood (AB). Each was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole. They appeal, raising Brady 1 and Napue 2 issues, and claiming instructional error. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard RenziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Susan RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Oscar RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API