United States v. Houston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Henry Michael Houston and Wayne Bridgewater were jointly tried and convicted of a substantive Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violation, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); RICO conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and two counts of violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity (VICAR), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, arising out of their membership in the Aryan Brotherhood (AB). Each was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole. They appeal, raising Brady 1 and Napue 2 issues, and claiming instructional error. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Richard RenziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Susan RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Oscar RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.