People v. Dilwood
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny in stealing a calf, and now prosecutes this appeal.
The court gave the jury the following instruction upon the subject of circumstantial evidence: “As mathematical or absolute certainty is seldom to be obtained in human affairs, reason and public utility require that jurors, as well as all mankind, in forming their opinion of facts, should be regulated by the superior number of probabilities on the one side or the other, whether the amount of these probabilities be expressed in words, or arguments, or by figures and numbers.” We have looked in vain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. SansomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. SalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. OldhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. CollumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. StokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. AyhensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.