Legal Opinion

Izett v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1900No. 3320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — lion. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Action to recover the value of a lot of saw logs sold and delivered by respondents to appellant. Respondents contracted to sell to appellant logs which respondents were getting óut and rafting at Oamano Island. The price to be paid was agreed upon, and was to be paid when the logs were scaled. There was no agreement as to where the scaling should be done. When a raft was gotten out, respondents notified appellant that it was ready. Appellant sent a tug, with an order to deliver the logs to the tug, and they were so delivered. The raft…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rastetter v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. First National Bank v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Phoenix Packing Co. v. Humphrey-Ball Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Orillia Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Heybrook v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API