Legal Opinion

In Re Taub

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The parties to this proceeding have seen fit to bring it into this court by a petition to revise and by an appeal. There are certain proceedings in bankruptcy which can be reviewed by writ of error. There are others which are to be reviewed by an appeal. There are ¡others which are to be reviewed by petition to- re* vise. In general it may be said that the character of the proceedings determines the proper method to be pursued in bringing the proceedings into this court. Section 24a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9608) gives the Circuit Courts of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of LovingSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Stallman v. . KimberlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estherville Produce Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  4. North American Van Lines, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API