Legal Opinion

State v. Bowen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In a suit, to set. aside a deed as fraudulent as to the plaintiff’s claim it is not necessary or proper to make the creditors of the fraudulent grantor parties; — nor is it necessary or proper in such, a case to make the the joint judgment-debtors of the fraudulent grantor parties; — nor is it necessary in such a suit to allege in the bill the issuance, of and return upon an execution issued upon such judgment;— nor is it proper in such a suit to enquire whether the rents…

Read the full summary

In a suit, to set. aside a deed as fraudulent as to the plaintiff’s claim it is not necessary or proper to make the creditors of the fraudulent grantor parties; — nor is it necessary or proper in such, a case to make the the joint judgment-debtors of the fraudulent grantor parties; — nor is it necessary in such a suit to allege in the bill the issuance, of and return upon an execution issued upon such judgment;— nor is it proper in such a suit to enquire whether the rents and, profits of the landsought tobe subjected will pay the, judgments five years. — -21 W. Va. 207; 9 W. Va. 452; 24 W.…

1Opinion of the Court

English, President :

On the first Monday in September, 1891, the state of West Virginia filed its bill in the Circuit Court of Ivana-whr county against Aldorson Bowen, B. J. Pritchard and W. B. Spurlock, in which it alleged that on the lltb day of December, 1890, said'state, as plaintiff in an action at law brought in the Circuit Court of said county agaiusj William E. Wilkinson, late sheriff of Wayne county, and *93Alderson Bowen and others, sureties on the official. bond of said W. E. 'Wilkinson, sheriff eic., for the default of said sheriff, recovered a judgment for eighteen thousand seven…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. McCool v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. Sweeny v. Sugar Refining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Core v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Duncan, Ford & Elder v. CustardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. Dudley v. BuckleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Farmers' Bank of Fairmont v. GouldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Crickmer v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API