Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Feist
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1901No. 1,511PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. In Bankruptcy. From a judgment of the district court sustaining the objection of Max Feist and others, creditors, to a discharge of the bankrupt, the bankrupt appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.
Creditors of William Bauman, bankrupt, filed in the district court the following specifications of objections to his discharge:
“(1) That the said Wm. Bauman has committed an offense punishable by imprisonment under the bankruptcy act, to wit, that the said Wm. Bauman knowingly and fraudulently testified under oath falsely upon examination before Referee John M. Helmick, February 6, 1900, that he did not state to W- B. Wiley, nor to W. H. Wilson, in the city of Davenport, at or about the time of leasing a .certain storeroom of said W. B. Wiley, that the P. Bauman Oo.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Edelstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Willoughby v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Leon B. Meer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Hanover-Capital Trust Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- In re ChamberlainDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.