Legal Opinion

In re Chamberlain

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In the matter of Walter W. Chamberlain, bankrupt. On motion to confirm the report of a special master overruling specifications of objections to the bankrupt’s discharge, and recommending that a discharge be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

Section 14 of the bankruptcy act provides that:

“The judge shall hear the application for a discharge and such proofs and pleas as may be made in opposition thereto by parties in interest * * * and investigate the merits of the application and discharge the applicant unless he has (1) committed an offense punishable by imprisonment as herein provided. * * * ” Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 (U. S. Clomp. St. 1901, p. 3427).

The objections here are that the bankrupt has committed such an offense, viz., that such bankrupt “knowingly and fraudulently,” when under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Troeder v. LorschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  2. In re HowdenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1901
  3. Bauman v. FeistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Chaudhry v. Ksenzowski (In Re Ksenzowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  3. Leon B. Meer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Hanover-Capital Trust Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. RhodesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API