Legal Opinion

Robert Defoy v. John M. McCullough Superintendent: Gerald J. Pappert, Att. General: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 4, 2005No. 03-3474PublishedCited by 249 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from a situation that is troubling on several accounts: First, because it highlights the procedural morass that state prisoners face in pursuing habe-as relief, and second, because it illustrates the tension between what should be the touchstone of any penal system-rehabilitation-and a convicted sex offender’s rights against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment. Presently, we must determine whether a Pennsylvania state prisoner challenging his denial of parole on Fifth Amendment grounds must first seek a writ of mandamus in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by249 opinions

  1. Robert Benchoff v. Raymond ColleranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Shawn Parker v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Mario Abreu v. Superintendent Smithfield SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Roman v. DiGuglielmoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Stankowski v. FarleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API