Morgan v. Wilfley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Page Distriet Court. Mandamus to compel the defendant to remove a school - bouse from sub-district No. 1 to sub-district No. 9, in obedience to the action of the board of directors, or to erect the necessary school-house- in sub-district No. 9. ■ There was a judgment in accord with the prayer of plaintiff’s petition. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
1. Evidence: parol to aid minutes of school board. I. The plaintiff at the trial introduced in evidence the minutes of the proceedings of the board of direc tors district township of East River. It showed that a certain motion was adopted, but fape(j gPo^ wbat the motion was. Plaintiff' was permitted to show, against defendants’ objection, by the witness who was secretary when the motion was adopted, that it was to the effect that a new school-house he built in district No. 1, and the old house be removed to district No. *2139. The admission of this evidence is now complained of by defendants. We…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Edwards & Walsh Construction Co. v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. Independent School. Dist. of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- County Board of Education v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Johnston v. FitzhughOregon Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.