Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
Seven of the defendants have specifically objected that a number of the interrogatories are such as to impose a tremendous burden and expense upon the defendants in obtaining the answers to such interrogatories. Five of the defendants have specifically objected to interrogatories 6 through 13, as they are numbered in the interrogatories addressed to RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. Taking these interrogatories as an example, we find the following information required:
Interrogatory 6. List all theatres located in the key run cities of the United States (over 100,000 population)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- Konczakowski v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Krantz v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
- Greene v. RaymondDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.