Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2000No. 99-164PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We find that that the doctrine of res judicata applies to this case, and accordingly reverse the court of appeals.

At the outset, we must determine whether there is an identity of parties in the two actions. Res judicata operates as “ ‘a complete bar to any subsequent action on the same claim or cause of action between the parties or those in privity with them.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Johnson’s Island, Inc. v. Danbury Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 241, 243, 23 O.O.3d 243, 245, 431 N.E.2d 672, 674, quoting Norwood v. McDonald (1943), 142 Ohio St. 299, 27 O.O. 240, 52 N.E.2d 67,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Thompson v. WingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. O'Nesti v. DeBartolo Realty Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kirkhart v. KeiperOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Abdulsalaam v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Brown v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 2000

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API