Legal Opinion

Davis v. Young Californian Shoes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1981No. 20489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOREY, Justice.

Young Californian Shoes sued Bill Davis and his wife Connie Davis “jointly and severally and as copartners, d/b/a/ K L & K Shoe Tree,” on a sworn account under Tex. R.Civ.P. 185. Bill Davis answered, denying liability individually as required by rule 185. He claimed inability to deny the partnership’s liability on the account, but denied that he was a partner in K L & K, claiming that it was solely his wife’s enterprise. An affidavit was attached to his denial, asserting that the defensive allegations were “true and correct to the best of his knowledge.” At trial before the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ashcroft v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Juarez v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Booher v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Ramsey v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Nelson Utilities Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1987
  2. In the Interest of A.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API