State v. Burgholzer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence of methamphetamine found by a police officer during the course of a traffic stop. The state contends that the trial court erred because the evidence was admissible under the search incident to arrest exception to the warrant requirement. We review for errors of law and reverse and remand.
The facts are not in dispute. On February 17, 2000, Officer Durbin stopped defendant for speeding. Upon approaching defendant’s vehicle, Durbin noticed that defendant was acting strangely. According to Durbin, defendant appeared to be in “fast-forward.” His…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HoskinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FeslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. ARMENDARIZ-NUNEZNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.