Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 3, 1994No. 92-036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant pled nolo contendere to two counts of sexual assault, 13 V.S.A. §§ 3252(a)(1)(A), 3253(a)(7) (aggravated), reserving the right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to determine his competency to stand trial. V.R.Cr.E 11(a)(2) (conditional plea). He also claims on appeal, for the first time in these proceedings, that his pleas were accepted in violation of V.R.Cr.E 11(c)(1) and (2) because he was not informed of, nor did the court determine whether he understood, the nature of the crimes charged and their penalties. We do not reach the merits of defendant’s unpreserved claim of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. GabertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. State v. DoleszneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. State v. BlishSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API