Carl Houston Roberts and Roy Malcolm Roberts v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Roy Malcolm Roberts and Carl Houston Roberts, father and son, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appeal from the order of the district court (Judge Regan), 348 F.Supp. 563, denying them relief from their convictions and sentences for assault upon federal officers. 1
The layman’s brief filed on behalf of appellants raises two issues already considered and found wanting of merit on direct appeal, i. e., that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish guilt, and that appellants were denied their Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. Appellants now assert an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. James Pappas Appeal of Richard S. MischlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., United States of America v. Clayborne Jamison, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Robert W. Crouch and Albert Kudelka, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Domenic Nicholas DisilvioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Fred Douglas Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.