Legal Opinion

United States v. Domenic Nicholas Disilvio

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 17, 1975No. 75-1083PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before ADAMS, ROSENN and HUNTER, Circuit Judges. JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

■ In this case, we must decide whether the double jeopardy clause bars the federal government from prosecuting appellant, Domenic DiSilvio, on a second indictment. The initial indictment was dismissed on defendant’s motion after the jury had been impanelled and after evidence had been offered by the prosecution. We conclude that the double jeopardy clause does not bar a second trial. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss the second indictment.

I

Appe…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Helstoski v. MeanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. United States v. Skeeter Cyphers and David WillmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A MartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API