Legal Opinion

Cook v. Seay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hemphill County; F. P. Greever, Judge. Action between Jim Cook and G. W. Seay. From a judgment for Seay, Cook appeals. Appellee moved to strike the statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, C. J.

Appellee has filed in this court a motion to strike from the record the statement of facts on file in this cause because same was not filed in the trial court within 30 days after adjournment of the trial court for the term át which the case was tried, there being no order of the trial court in the record granting an extension of time beyond the 30 days allowed by the statute, and the court not being, by operation of law, authorized to continue for as long as 8 weeks, and, further, because it is claimed by appellee in said motion that appellant has failed to file a copy of the statement of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamill v. SamuelsTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Couturie v. CrespiTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pecos & Northern Texas Railroad v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrison v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Water & Light Co. of El Campo v. El Campo Light, Ice & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API