Legal Opinion

Carmen Contreras Aybar v. Secretary United States Depart

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 19, 2019No. 18-1462PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmbro, Circuit Judge

Carmen Josefina Contreras Aybar ("Carmen") became a lawful permanent resident under provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") known as the "U Visa" statute. She then sought permanent resident status for her son, Dario, based on a related provision of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (m)(3), which empowers the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") to grant that status to certain family members, including a "child," of an immigrant in Carmen's situation. But that application hit a snag: while it was pending Carmen's son reached the age of twenty-one, which made him ineligible…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zheng Zheng v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. GeiserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. De Leon-Ochoa v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Hanif v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ludimilla Ramos Da Silva v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Liquid Labs LLC v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  3. Maria Medina Tovar v. Laura ZuchowskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Com. v. Hernandez, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. DOE v. MAYORKASDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API