Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 8, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The appellant, General Motors Corporation (“GMC”), appeals from an order of the Superior Court affirming a decision of the Industrial Accident Board (the “Board”). In its decision, the Board ordered GMC, inter alia, to pay for certain vocational educational services as medical expenses of the appellee, Curtis Burgess, Jr. (“Burgess”), pursuant to 19 Del. C. § 2322. The Board also granted separate applications for attorney’s fees by Burgess pursuant to 19 Del. C. § 2127.

We have concluded that 19 Del. C. § 2322 provides no basis for the Board to order an employer to pay for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Newtowne Village Service Corp. v. Newtowne Road Development Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Freeman v. X-Ray Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Schuster v. DerociliSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Simmons v. Delaware State HospitalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API