Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1892No. 591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso. Tried below before Hon. T. A. Falvey. This appeal is from a conviction for bigamy, wherein the punishment affixed by the court below was three years confinement in the penitentiary. A statement of the evidence elicited in the case is not required, beyond the fact that a valid subsisting previous marriage was proved by the prosecution.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of bigamy. On the trial the State adduced in evidence the marriage license. During the argument defendant’s counsel moved to exclude the license because it did not show upon its face to have been issued by the county clerk, he being the only officer authorized by law to issue such license. At the time the license issued the offices of district and county clerk of El Paso County were held and filled by the same person, under the provisions of law. That the officer signed the license as district clerk instead of as county clerk, could not and did not…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hemsell v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. BozemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. GantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API