Legal Opinion
Pullman Co. v. Ray
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1953No. [No. 51, October Term, 1952.]Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
201 Md. 268 (1953)
94 A.2d 266
PULLMAN CO.
v.
RAY
[No. 51, October Term, 1952.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided January 9, 1953.
Motion for rehearing, filed February 9, 1953.
Denied February 13, 1953.
The cause was argued before DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.
Douglas N. Sharretts, with whom were Harlan, Sharrets and Purcell and Mason P. Morfit, on the brief, for appellant.
Joseph Allen, with whom were Fred Oken and Jacob D. Hornstein, on the brief, for appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · HendersonHenderson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment on a jury's verdict for damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of life employment.…
3Cases cited51 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Crunkilton v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.