Legal Opinion

Hill v. Frink

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1895No. 1538PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Lincoln County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Anders, J.

This was an action to foreclose a laborer’s lien on a certain quantity of wheat owned by the defendant, W. E. Frink. The defendants, other than W. E. Frink and Gehres & Hertrich, claimed similar liens on the same wheat, which they asked to have foreclosed. Each of them -filed a separate answer with which was incorporated a cross complaint, so-called, against the defendants Gehres & Hertrich, who, it appears held a chattel mortgage on the grain in controversy, alleging, in brief, that said co-defendants unlawfully took possession of said wheat…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Johnson v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Larson v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Moeser v. Republic Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API