Rohr v. Shaffer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from CMckasaw District Court. — A. N. Hobson, Judge. Action in equity to rescind an exchange of lands because of alleged fraud and misrepresentation on part of defendants. There was a decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
1. Principal and agent: the relation: evidonee: sum-Defendant Brown is a dealer in real estate, doing business at New Hampton, Iowa, and his co-defendants W. Gr. Shaffer and A. H. Shaffer are bankers and real estate dealers at the same place. At the time of the . _ . transaction here m controversy, one Willenborg officed with Brown, and did more or less business as a real estate agent. The exact nature of the business relations between Willenborg and Brown is one of the matters involved in this litigation. In the year 1910, plaintiff, a young farmer residing at or near G-rinnell, Iowa,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Baker v. . LeverNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Clapp v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Moore v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Beardsley v. ClemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lanz v. NaddyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Edwards v. FoleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Hogan v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Nolan v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Bronson v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.