United States v. Hutchison
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKantor, Judge
I concur with the majority as to its resolution of the initially assigned errors. However, I respectfully dissent from certain portions of the majority and concurring opinions addressing the supplemental assignment of error asserting that the Government failed to comply with Article 2-B-4 of the then-current MJM, Commandant Instruction M5810.1C, thus violating Rule for Courts-Martial (RCM) 201(d)’s policy against second trials. Despite finding that there was no double jeopardy issue; that the Coast Guard had jurisdiction to try the Appellant; and that there was “no other basis that warrants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.